Playing
Trends in Video Poker
The
following is taken from Power Video Poker, the Only Video Poker
Book You'll Ever Need!
Trends are a fact of life in gambling.
They occur in virtually every gambling game ever devised.
Blackjack dealers go on streaks and win nearly every hand.
At other times, the dealers bust hand after hand.
Roulette wheels repeat some numbers with much greater frequency
than expected and other numbers are not hit at all.
And video poker machines will go into a streak mode where a
large number of higher paying hands are made in a short time
period. At other times, the machines have periods of almost no
winning hands.
When all of the favorable, neutral and unfavorable streaks are
added together over an extremely long period of play, the
results will approximate the mathematical expectations of the
game. In other
words, if you play at a game with positive expectations, and
play every hand and do not vary the size of your wagers, then
over a long period of continuous play, certainly for at least a
month and more likely for three to six months, your results will
start to resemble the long-term expectations of the game you are
playing. This
result is the basis of long-term or professional video poker
play. If you have a
mathematical edge over a game and you play the game long enough,
then your winnings should approximate the long-term expected
value of the amount of your advantage.
With short-term play, our expectations will be different.
For one thing, we will not play any single game or
machine long enough for the mathematical expectations to have
much bearing. In
addition, we will vary the size or our wagers dependent upon how
well we are faring on a particular machine.
Let me rephrase this last thought.
When you are a weekend video poker player, you will
adjust your wagers based on how the machine is trending.
We have already discussed the most basic
adjustments to machine trending.
You will divide your gambling bankroll into smaller
bankrolls for session play.
A round of play consists of playing all of your coins in
your Session (Game) Bankroll through a machine.
With a loss hitting or exceeding your Loss Limit, you
will quit playing on this machine.
If you hit your Profit Goal, you will modify your play
and lock up some profits.
If you think about it, when you quit playing because of losses
or go into your profit-taking mode playing with your excess
winnings or Protected Profits you are
adjusting your play to the machine’s trends.
The ultimate goal of changing your style of play is to
follow favorable trends and avoid unfavorable ones.
There is yet another way you will react to
trends. You will
change the size of your bets as you play.
Let’s take a look at a hypothetical coin toss game.
There are three players in the game and each player bets
only tails. When
tails shows, the players’ have a win, when heads show, they
all lose.
Table 26 compares the results of the three
coin players’ betting styles.
Player A wagers $10 on each coin toss. He
does not modify his bet size regardless of whether he is losing
or winning. His
style of betting is the way most players gamble
-whether the game is a coin toss, blackjack or video
poker. In eight
coin tosses, consisting or four heads and four tails, Player A
breaks even, ending the contest with exactly the same amount of
money as when he started.
Player B decides to double his bet
following a loss and to continue doubling losing bets until he
has a win. His strategy shows a profit of $30 in eight coin tosses.
Player C uses $10 as his neutral bet.
If he has a win, he increases his next wager to $15, and
if this bet also wins, he reduces his next wager to $5.
If his bet loses, he continues to wager $10 on the next
bet. Using this
strategy he wins a total of $20 in eight coin tosses.
Player A’s betting, where he never varies
the size of his wager, requires that the wager he is making must
win a majority of the decisions in order for him to win.
He is betting that there will be a dominance of either
heads or tails in a few decisions and that his wager on tails
will dominate. Because neither heads nor tails dominates, he breaks even.
Player B wagered that any short-term losing
streak would be broken by a winning wager in a few decisions.
This strategy gave him the largest win of the three
players. However,
his largest bet was $80, and, if he had lost this bet he may
have been in too deep to double his wager again.
Even though his strategy had the highest win, it may be
too risky for practical use.
Player C’s strategy won $20, with a high
wager of only $15. He
raised his wagers moderately after a win and then immediately
reduced the size of his wager following a second win.
This example is better suited to betting
even chance wagers at table games.
There are virtually no video poker games which allow you
to raise your wager from $10 to $80, or from one coin to eight
coins, so we really can’t duplicate this strategy at video
poker.
Table
26. Wagering Styles in a Coin Toss Contest
(Players
bet on tails (t))
|
t
|
t
|
h
|
h
|
h
|
t
|
t
|
h
|
Net
Win
|
Player A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Bet
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
Won (Lost)
|
+10
|
+10
|
-10
|
-10
|
-10
|
+10
|
+10
|
-10
|
-0-
|
Player B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Bet
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
20
|
40
|
80
|
10
|
10
|
|
Won (Lost)
|
+10
|
+10
|
-10
|
-20
|
-40
|
+80
|
+10
|
-10
|
+30
|
Player C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Bet
|
10
|
15
|
5
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
15
|
15
|
|
Won (Lost)
|
+1-
|
+15
|
-5
|
-10
|
-10
|
+10
|
_15
|
-5
|
+20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let’s try
a different set of strategies designed especially for video
poker. Table 27 shows the results of ten plays of video poker.
The top portion of the table recaps a Neutral Strategy of
betting one coin per play.
This strategy wins a total of 7 coins, shown as the Total
Win in the last column under Play #10.
The results
are very typical of Jacks or Better video poker. Let’s follow
the action playing this Neutral Strategy.
In
this first play, we insert one coin and lose it.
Our payoff is –1, indicating the loss of our coin and
our Total Win is –1 after this play.
On the second play, we win a 1 for 1 payoff with a High
Pair (HP). The
payoff is shown as –0-, as we really don’t gain from the
payoff, we just receive our money back.
Our Total Win is still –1 after this play.
We lose on play 3, and our total loss
(shown in the Total Win row) is now –2.
On the fourth play, we hit another High Pair (HP) and
maintain our total loss of –2.
The fifth play is another loss, increasing our total loss
to –3. On play 6
we hit a Flush (FL) and add a net 5 to 1 (the flush pays 6 for
1, which the same as 5 to 1) to our winnings.
Our total win is now positive with a +2.
Plays 7 and 8 are both losses, bringing our
net win down to zero. On
play 9 we hit a Full House (FH) and add a net 8 to 1 (the full
house pays 9 for 1, which is the same as 8 to 1) to our winnings
for a total net of +8. We
lose the last play and end up the series with a net win of +7,
representing 7 coins.
With our Neutral Strategy, betting one
coin per play, we wagered at total of 10 coins and won 7 coins.
Our win rate was 70% computed by dividing the amount won
by the amount wagers (7/10 = 0.70).
This is a very good win rate.
Let’s see how some different betting strategies fared.
Table
27. Comparison of
Wagering Styles at Video Poker
Play
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
Neutral
Strategy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Hand
|
-
|
HP
|
-
|
HP
|
-
|
FL
|
-
|
-
|
FH
|
-
|
Payoff
|
-1
|
-0-
|
-1
|
-0-
|
-1
|
5
|
-1
|
-1
|
8
|
-1
|
Total Win
|
-1
|
-1
|
-2
|
-2
|
-3
|
+2
|
+1
|
-0-
|
+8
|
+7
|
Player A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Bet
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Won (Lost)
|
-2
|
0
|
-2
|
-4
|
-6
|
+4
|
+2
|
-0-
|
+16
|
-2
|
Total Win
|
-2
|
-2
|
-4
|
-4
|
-6
|
+2
|
+2
|
-0-
|
+16
|
+14
|
Player B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Bet
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
Won (Lost)
|
-2
|
0
|
-3
|
-0-
|
-4
|
+25
|
-2
|
-3
|
+32
|
-2
|
Total Win
|
-2
|
-2
|
-5
|
-5
|
-9
|
+16
|
+14
|
+11
|
+43
|
+41
|
Player C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Bet
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
Won (Lost)
|
-2
|
-0-
|
-2
|
-0-
|
-2
|
+10
|
-4
|
-4
|
+32
|
-4
|
Total Win
|
-2
|
-2
|
-4
|
-4
|
-6
|
+4
|
-0-
|
-4
|
+28
|
+24
|
Player D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Bet
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
Won (Lost)
|
-1
|
-0-
|
-2
|
-0-
|
-3
|
+20
|
-4
|
-5
|
+49
|
-1
|
Total Win
|
-1
|
-1
|
-3
|
-3
|
-6
|
+14
|
+1-
|
+5
|
+36
|
+34
|
Player A bets 2 coins per play and doesn’t adjust his
play. His only
decision is to insert 2 coins and then play the hands.
He wins a total of 14 coins, with a total investment of
20 coins, for a win rate of 70%.
Once we decide to play the same number of coins each play, or
win rate will remain constant, whether we insert one, two,
three, four or five coins per play.
This is why Player A has the same win rate as the Neutral
Strategy. Wagering
the same amount (also called “flat betting”) may not be the
best strategy as we have seen in our earlier coin toss example.
Let’s look at some different strategies devised
specifically for video poker.
Player B varies the size of his wager
dependent on the outcome of the previous play.
He starts with a two-coin bet and raises his wager by one
coin after a losing bet and bets the same after a
“break-even” bet.
For play 1, he wagers two coins and loses.
Because this was a losing bet, on play 2 he wagers 3
coins and breaks even with a High Pair. Play 3 following a break-even play is also for 3 coins.
He loses play 3 and raises his bet to 4 coins for play 4,
which also loses. Play
5 is a 5-coin bet. If
he had lost this bet, he would have starting reducing his
wagers. Fortunately,
this wager wins and his next wager is reduced to 2 coins
following a win. Play
7 loses and Player B raises his wager to 3 coins for play 8.
Play 8 loses and 4 coins are wagered for play 9 which
wins. Following
this win, the wager for play 10 is reduced to 2 coins.
Player B wagered a total of 32 coins and
won 41 coins for a Win Rate of 128% (41/32 = 1.28).
We can see that this wagering style is more efficient
than the style used by Player A as the Win Rate is better.
Player C decided to start his wagering at
two coins. He
decided to raise his wager only after winning bets in contrast
to Player B who raised his wagers after losing bets.
Player C used this formula:
Bet the same amount (starting with 2 coins)
until there is a net win. If
the wager is a break-even one, ignore it and wager the same
amount on the next play.
Following a net win (not a break-even), raise the next
wager to 4 coins and keep it at this level until a bet wins or
for three losing plays. If
there are no wins in three plays, drop the wager back down to 2
coins.
Using this betting pattern, Player C made
two-coin bets for plays 1 through 5 as there was no net win
until play 5. Following
the win on play 5 he raised his wager to 4 coins.
He had a net win on play 9 and continued with his 4 coin
wager on play 10.
Player C wagered a total of 28 coins and
won 24 coins for a win rate of 85% (24/28 = .85).
Player D’s betting pattern was a fixed
one as follows: 1 2
2 3 3 4 4 5 5 1, with each number representing the number of
coins on the play. He
inserted a total of 30 coins with a net win of 34 coins, for a
Win Rate of 113% (34/30 = 1.13).
I don’t want you to try to pick a
preferred wagering method at this time.
So long as you exclude wagering the same amount over and
over as your preferred strategy, you can be successful with
increasing your wagers after losses, like Player B or only
increasing your wagers after you have a net win, like Player C.
Or, you may prefer to use a fixed betting pattern like
Player D.
As we shall see in the next few
chapters, there are many ways to devise betting strategies,
including mixing the concepts of increasing wagers after losses
and increasing wagers after wins.
Instant
Access to the Power
Video Poker Strategy
Gamblers Bookcase
5901-J Wyoming NE Suite 305
Albuquerque NM 87109
© 1998 - 2013 Gamblers Bookcase · All Rights Reserved
Email Contact
|